Legal Opinion

Morton v. Hines

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1920No. 15776PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lewis county, Reynolds, J., entered September 26, 1919, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing consolidated actions for damages for overflowing lands, tried to the court and a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The appellants Morton and wife and the appellants Schank and wife brought separate actions against the respondent, Walker D. Hines, as director general of railroads, to recover in damages for injuries to their real property, alleged to have been caused by the wrongful acts of the respondent while in the maintenance and operation of the railroad of *613the Oregon-Washington Bailroad & Navigation Company, of which he was then director. After issue had been joined on the complaints, the causes were consolidated for trial, and a trial entered upon before the court sitting with a jury. At the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cass v. DicksWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Wood v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Harvey v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Miller v. Eastern Railway & Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Noyes v. CosselmanWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gaines v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  2. King County v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Halverson v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Hedlund v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. Sund v. KeatingWashington Supreme Court · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API