Legal Opinion

Halverson v. Skagit County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1999No. 66171-5PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

This is a direct appeal from a judgment on a jury verdict in an inverse condemnation action. Over 100 residents of the Nookachamps area of Skagit County, Washington, suffered flooding in November 1990. Claiming that the County took their lands without just compensation contrary to the eminent domain provisions of the Washington State Constitution,1 Plaintiffs brought suit against Skagit County.2

We hold Plaintiffs failed to plead a viable theory for imposing liability on the County for the levee-induced flood*4ing because the County did not own the levees or property on which they were built.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Bodin v. City of StanwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Paulson v. County of PierceWashington Supreme Court · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Grundy v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Grundy v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Pruitt v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. Fitzpatrick v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Fitzpatrick v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API