Legal Opinion

Sund v. Keating

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1953No. 32298PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

The plaintiffs instituted an action in the superior court for Mason county to recover damages done to their oyster beds by defendants’ allegedly negligent diversion of a stream. After a trial to the court, fact findings and conclusions of law adverse to the defendants were entered, and judgment was rendered thereon in the amount of five thousand dollars damages. The defendants have appealed.

Before the facts of this case become understandable, it is necessary to describe with some precision the locale involved and the nature of appellants’ operations in connection therewith.

Respondents and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Senior Citizens League, Inc. v. Department of Social SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cass v. DicksWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Gaasland Co. v. Hyak Lumber & Millwork, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. O'Connell v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Dunseath v. HallauerWashington Supreme Court · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sigman v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Halverson v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Wenzler & Ward Plumbing & Heating Co. v. SellenWashington Supreme Court · 1958

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API