Legal Opinion

Hedlund v. White

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 9, 1992No. 13558-2-IIPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

Kathleen Hedlund alleged that Jack White, Ellen White and Pearl Baumgartner (collectively referred to as White) were wrongfully draining surface water into a swale and creek that pass over her land. After the trial court denied her an injunction and damages, she appealed. We affirm as modified.

Hedlund and White own contiguous farms along the Puyallup River. White's farm is south of and uphill from Hedlund's.

White's farm has two natural drainage basins, one on its west side and one on its east side. Surface water in the western basin naturally drains to the river through Swale 80, an oxbow…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Cornerstone Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Borland v. Sanders Lead Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Valley View Industrial Park v. City of RedmondWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Cass v. DicksWashington Supreme Court · 1896

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Phillips v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. Currens v. SleekWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Bosteder v. City of RentonWashington Supreme Court · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API