Legal Opinion
Coyne v. Metabolix, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 20, 2013No. Civil Action No. 12-10318-DPWPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiff Hilary Coyne brings this lawsuit alleging securities fraud by Defendant Metabolix, Inc. and two of its executives, Richard Eno and Joseph Hill. Plaintiff contends the Defendants misrepresented the company’s ability to meet certain projected milestones in its biopolymer plastic manufacturing business and that it hid issues regarding product quality.
Defendants move to dismiss arguing Plaintiff has not sufficiently alleged (1) any material misrepresentation, (2) that Defendants knew any misrepresentation was false, even if one did…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re Biogen Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Collier v. ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Sousa v. Sonus Networks, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Miller Inv. Trust v. Morgan Stanley & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Metzler Asset Mgmt. GMBH v. KingsleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.