Legal Opinion

KMS Fusion, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 4, 1991No. 649-87CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Chief Judge.

This is a direct access suit under the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. (1982). Plaintiff, KMS Fusion, Inc. (KMS) claims it is entitled to recover amounts allegedly due under a contract with the United States Department of Energy (DOE). KMS maintains that it is entitled to approximately $1,000,000 in indirect costs incurred in calendar years 1983 and 1984 which were improperly denied in a final decision of the contracting officer (CO).

This case comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. There are six types of indirect…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Betty Sankovich v. The Life Insurance Company of North America and Credit Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Lockheed Aircraft Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Fmc Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Grumman Aerospace Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allenfield Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  2. Teknowledge Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API