Legal Opinion

Grumman Aerospace Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 15, 1978No. 71-76PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before the court on plaintiffs request for review of the recommended decision of Trial Judge Harry E. Wood, filed October 25, 1977, pursuant to Rule 166(c), on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, having been submitted on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, since the Court agrees with the trial judge’s recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth, it hereby affirms and adopts the said decision as the basis for its judgment in this case. Therefore, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is denied, defendant’s cross-motion for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Bulova Watch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. H & M Moving, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  4. United States v. Foster Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hercules Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Tosco Corp. v. HodelDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1985
  3. Teledyne, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  4. Hercules Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  5. KMS Fusion, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API