Legal Opinion
Allenfield Associates v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 2, 1998No. 94-1089CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*474OPINION
YOCK, Judge.
This contract action for the recovery of current market rents for the Federal Government’s use of the plaintiffs property comes before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). In its Complaint, the plaintiff contends that the defendant breached its contractual duty to vacate the premises at the termination of its leasehold interest and, in the alternative, that such a failure to vacate the premises amounted to a taking of the current market rental value of the…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Modeer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Buse Timber & Sales, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- General Services v. Little-Tex InsulationTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Reunion, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Lyons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.