Legal Opinion

Nabaya v. Lauck

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 16, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2023-2650Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHAPAT NABAYA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-2650 (ACR) MARY HANNAH LAUCK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Pro se Plaintiff Shapat Nabaya sued Defendant Mary Hannah Lauck, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia. See Dkt. 1 (Complaint). 1 Plaintiff “is a serial filer with a history of bringing meritless cases, in this court and others, against public officials.” Nabaya v. Aber, No. 17-cv-440, 2018 WL 1583311, at *1 (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2018) (citing cases). In October 2017, he was convicted of Retaliating Against an…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  5. Second Amendment Foundation v. United States Conference of MayorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API