Legal Opinion

Kideckel v. Foreign Nation of Canada

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 16, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2024-2907Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRENT KIDECKEL, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-02907 (CJN) FOREIGN NATION OF CANADA et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On August 12, 2025, the Court dismissed Plaintiff Brent Kideckel’s lawsuit for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. ECF No. 145 (Order). Noting that Kideckel is a serial plaintiff who has been deemed a vexatious litigant in multiple states and has filed 32 motions in this action in less than a year, the Court also ordered Kideckel to show cause as to why sanctions should not be imposed under Federal Rule of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API