Davis v. Kleindienst
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LaPRADE, Judge.
We have before us for consideration appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion is grounded upon the fact that the record on appeal was not transmitted to the supreme court within the time required by the provisions of Rule 73(g), Rules Civ.Proc., being Section 21-1817, A. C.A.1939. Ordinarily this court does not prepare written decisions on motions of this character, but we feel it advisable to do so in the instant case as we did in the recent case of Sweeney v. Winslow Gas Company, 64 Ariz. 51, 165 P.2d 316. Our experience indicates that even though the new Rules of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carstens & Earles, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Middleton v. Hartford Acc. & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Sweeney v. Winslow Gas Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1946
- William Howard Hay Foundation, Inc. v. Safety Harbor Sanatorium, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Lount v. StroussArizona Supreme Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Caruth v. MarianiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Sam Levitz Furniture Co. v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Christensen v. PryorArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Dogarin v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Schaefer v. DuhameArizona Supreme Court · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.