Legal Opinion
Middleton v. Hartford Acc. & Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 16, 1941No. 9446PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
The suit was for compensation for injury under the Texas Workman’s Compensation Law, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St.Tex. art. 8306 et seq. The judge directed a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiffs having obtained an order to appeal in forma pau-peris under 28 U.S.C.A. § 832, gave notice of appeal, and filed a narrative statement of the evidence under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 75(c), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The appellee required that the stenographic report of the trial in question and answer form be substituted. The appellants went to the judge under…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Washington v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Bassing v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Blease v. GarlingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Elsea v. Broome Furniture Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Eugene P. Murphy and the Travelers Insurance Company v. The St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- A. D. Herring v. Kennedy-Herring Hardware Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- Fenkell v. FenkellNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Hanna v. Home Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.