William Howard Hay Foundation, Inc. v. Safety Harbor Sanatorium, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
A reading of the record appellant has submitted with the motion for leave to file a mandamus makes it clear that appellant’s difficulties in obtaining its record arise out of a misapprehension on its part as to the course it should pursue. If it pursues the course clearly provided by Rule 75 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, Record on Appeal to a Circuit Court of Appeals, no occasion will arise for resort to the mandamus it now seeks. That course does not require appellant to obtain approval by the court of the statement of the testimony it desires to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Middleton v. Hartford Acc. & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
3Cited by7 opinions
- Belt v. HoltonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Hanna v. Home Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Davis v. KleindienstArizona Supreme Court · 1946
- Park-In Theatres, Inc. v. WatersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Dr. William Howard Hay Foundation v. Safety Harbor SanatoriumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.