People v. Sherman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HAHN, J., pro tem.
Defendant and appellant was charged by information filed by the district attorney of Los Angeles County, in each of three counts with the crime of issuing checks without sufficient funds. Count III was dismissed by the court during the trial and a verdict of guilty was found against the defendant upon counts I and II. From this judgment of conviction and denial of his motion for a new trial, defendant prosecutes this appeal.
Appellant first urges that there is insufficient evidence to sustain the verdict as to the charge in count I. The evidence relating to this charge may be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. BercovitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- People v. WeaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- People v. KhanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. ZimmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- People v. CortzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- People v. MegladderyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- People v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.