Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1924No. Crim. No. 807PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The appellant was convicted of the crime of issuing a check without having sufficient funds on deposit in the drawee bank to pay the same. The defendant’s motion for a new trial having been denied, he appeals therefrom and from the judgment of conviction rendered herein.

It appears from the transcript that some time prior to the issuance of the check upon which this action is based, to wit, in the month of August, 1923, the defendant sold to one Roy A. Mast certain royalties in oil wells at Signal Hill, in the state of California, for which royalties Mast paid to Williams the sum of two…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. KhanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State v. MeeksArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. BradleyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. People v. ZimmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. People v. CortzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API