People v. Megladdery
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
The defendant was tried by a jury upon an indictment charging four separate violations of section 476a of the Peiial Code. He was found guilty on each of the four counts of the indictment, and thereafter moved for a new trial as to each count. These motions were all denied, and the appeal is taken from those orders and from the judgment following the verdict.
Neither the appellant nor the respondent has complied with the court rule requiring a statement of the issues involved upon the appeal. The appellant has not made a statement of the facts upon which the judgment is founded. The respondent…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. BoggessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. ThornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- People v. JuehlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- People v. TwedtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. ZimmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. RushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. SpaiseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. La RoccaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.