Legal Opinion

People v. Bercovitz

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1912No. Crim. No. 1724PublishedCited by 40 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

Defendant was convicted of a felony and appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The information was drawn under the provisions of section 476a of the Penal Code, and charged the defendant with having on or about the sixth day of February, 1911, at Bakersfield, California, with intent to defraud one H. Cohn, made, uttered, and delivered to said Cohn a check drawn for the sum of eighty-five dollars upon a. Bakersfield bank, when he, the defendant, had not sufficient funds in or credit with the bank to meet the check in full on presentation, as he then and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. WhalenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. People v. McGladeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. People v. FreytasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. State v. SedamIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Gumm v. HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. PoyetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API