People v. Khan
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Having been convicted of the crime of passing a check without having sufficient funds on deposit in the drawee bank to pay the same, defendant appeals from a judgment of imprisonment entered against him.
The crime charged was that described in section 476a of the Penal Code, which makes it a felony for a person, “with intent to defraud,” to draw or deliver to another a Check or draft on a bank, knowing at the time that he has not sufficient funds in or credit with the bank to meet the cheek. The concluding portion of the section reads as follows: “The word ‘credit’ as used herein shall be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. WilburCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- State v. MeeksArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. BradleyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- People v. ZimmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.