Legal Opinion

Brady v. Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1890PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Gratiot. (Hart, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

We are satisfied that the judgment in this case cannot be sustained upon reason or authority.

The plaintiff, while traveling southward with a team of horses hitched to a lumber wagon, on which he was riding, along a public highway in the town of North Star, Gratiot county, attempted to cross over the railroad track of the defendant company, and was struck by the engine of a passing train, and injured. He also claims damages for killing one of his horses, and damage to his wagon and harness. He brought his action in the Gratiot circuit court, and recovered a verdict and judgment for $1,500.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Haas v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Rhoades v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Oleson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Gardner v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Manos v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. City of Elkins v. Western Maryland Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API