Legal Opinion

Oleson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1896No. 17,500PublishedCited by 62 opinions

Erom the Porter Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This action was brought by appellant to recover damages for an injury received while attempting to cross appellee’s railroad track at a grade crossing.

There was a general denial to the complaint and trial by jury. After appellant had introduced all his evidence and rested his case, the jury, by direction of the court on motion of appellee, returned a verdict for appellee. *406The court thereupon over a motion for a new trial rendered judgment against appellant.

The only question presented is : Did the court err in instructing the jury to find for appellee? This instruction was given on the ground…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Continental Improvement Co. v. SteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Schofield v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Malott v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MilesIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Tesch v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API