Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Averyt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 7, 2011No. 11SA66Published

1Concurring in the judgmentJustice Marquez

In lieu of seeking any immediate relief that might have mitigated the perceived prejudice of Averyt's disclosure on the second day of trial, Wal-Mart instead made a tactical decision to introduce the Greeley report into evidence and use it to question Wal-Mart's designated corporate representative. The next morning, Wal-Mart turned over nearly seventy pages of previously undisclosed doe-uments corroborating the existence of the spill, and shifted the focus of its defense to its clean-up efforts. Having made this tactical decision and lost, Wal-Mart cannot now claim unfair prejudice justifying…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Todd v. Bear Valley Village ApartmentsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. Silva v. Basin Western, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. Tequila Centinela, S.A. de C.V. v. Bacardi & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. Cameron v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR FIRST JUD. D.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Samuel H. Sloan & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API