Legal Opinion
Cameron v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR FIRST JUD. D.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 6, 1977No. 27596PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
This is an original proceeding seeking relief in the nature of prohibition. C.A.R. 21. The petitioner is the plaintiff in a personal injury action which is pending before the respondent court. He filed a products liability claim alleging that a defective tire proximately caused the personal injuries which he suffered. In the course of a hearing on a defense request for a protective order, the trial judge entered an order which denied the plaintiff the right to conduct certain “destructive” tests upon the allegedly defective tire. We issued a rule to show cause. We now make the rule absolute…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Paul Martin and Verla Martin v. Reynolds Metals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Lucas v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Sarver v. Barrett Ace Hardware, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Curtis, Inc. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- American Water Development, Inc. v. City of AlamosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Hawkins v. District Court in & for the Fourth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. District Court for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. BrekkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Garrigan v. BowenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.