Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Samuel H. Sloan & Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 16, 1973No. 71 Civ. 2695PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendants for an order pursuant to Rule 34(b), Fed.R. Civ.P. requiring plaintiff to produce for inspection and copying the transcript of an administrative hearing held in the Matter of Samuel H. Sloan, et ano. (Adm.Pro. File No. 3-3680). For the reasons hereinafter stated, the motion is denied.

On April 25, 1972, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) instituted public administrative proceedings against Samuel H. Sloan & Co. and Samuel H. Sloan (“respondents”) alleging that respondents had wilfully violated the Commission’s Net…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Komow v. Simplex Cloth Cutting Machine Co.New York Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Tequila Centinela, S.A. de C.V. v. Bacardi & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  2. Snowden v. Connaught Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  3. Bleecker v. Standard Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2000
  4. Dushkin Publishing Group, Inc. v. Kinko's Service Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1991
  5. McKellips v. Kumho Tire Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API