Tequila Centinela, S.A. de C.V. v. Bacardi & Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiffs Motion [14] to Compel Discovery and Motion [15] to Amend the Scheduling Order and Discovery Plan. Upon consideration of the plaintiffs motions, the defendant’s opposition [18] thereto, the plaintiffs reply [20] brief, the applicable law, and the entire record herein, the Court concludes that the plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel will be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and the plaintiffs Motion to Amend will be GRANTED. The Court’s reasoning is set forth below.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Tequila Centinela,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Mancia v. Mayflower Textile Servs. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- DL v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Convertino v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Shatsky v. Syrian Arab RepublicDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.