Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Ass'n of Milk Dealers v. Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

Before the Court in an equity action in our original jurisdiction are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the petitioner, Pennsylvania Association of Milk Dealers, and Giant Eagle, Inc., the intervenor and real party in interest.

The parties have stipulated to the following relevant facts:

1. Petitioner', Pennsylvania Association of Milk Dealers (PAMD), represents the interests of Pennsylvania milk dealers and is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. ...

2. Respondent, the Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Board (the Board), is an agency…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Burke v. Pittsburgh Limestone Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. County of Armstrong v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Giant Eagle, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pries v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Piatek v. Pulaski TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. City of Philadelphia v. Tax Review BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. LTV Steel v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API