Legal Opinion
Piatek v. Pulaski Township
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 9, 2003PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge COHN.
The instant case is a local agency appeal in which the Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas affirmed the decision of the Pulaski Township Board of Supervisors (Board) denying applications for Adult Entertainment Facility (AEF) owner and employee licenses. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
Factual Background
Appellants are the owner (Boron) and employees (Piatek and Ferguson) of an AEF named Adultland that was operating in Pulaski Township, Lawrence County. 1 On May 22, 2000, Pulaski Township enacted ordinance 2000-5-22 (ordinance) which, inter alia, required the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- 41 Valley Associates v. Board of Supervisors of London Grove TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- 105 Floyd Road, Inc. v. Crisp CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Boron v. Pulaski Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Mitman v. Police Pension Commission of EastonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Hui v. City of Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.