Legal Opinion

McNair v. Parr

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1913No. Docket No. 58PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo; Knappen, J. Assumpsit by Rush McNair against Fred Parr for services rendered. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an action of assumpsit to recover for professional services as physician and surgeon in operating upon the defendant for hernia, and upon his daughter for appendicitis. The declaration was on the common counts in assumpsit, and the plaintiff filed a bill of particulars for the operations and the professional visits afterwards, which the testimony showed were included in the charge for opera*329tions. For each operation and. the accompanying visits there was a charge of $200, and the total amount claimed in the suit was $400.

The plea was the general issue, and the notice thereunder…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McNamara v. GargettMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Scribner v. CollarMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Wilbur v. StoepelMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Hogle v. MeyeringMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Friar v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reilly v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  2. Sweeney & Moore, Inc. v. ChapmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Brown v. HurtMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Kennedy v. StemmingMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Drummond v. CorbinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API