Legal Opinion

Sweeney & Moore, Inc. v. Chapman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1940No. Docket No. 8, Calendar No. 41,029PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, C. J.

Plaintiff corporation sued defendant on his written agreement to pay $687.50 for services in connection with the purchase of residential property in the city of Detroit. Plaintiff’s employee, Paul Schoeffel, arranged for the purchase of this property from Mrs. Mary A. Pfleiger. She had given an exclusive listing’ to Alfred P. Adamo, whose agency agreement expired November 22,1937. Prior to this date Mrs. Pfleiger agreed with Schoeffel to sell the property to defendant. After the transaction was consummated defendant refused to pay plaintiff for its services, claiming that Schoeffel and Adamo…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Quinn v. BurtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Smith v. StarkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hogle v. MeyeringMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Humphrey v. Eddy Transportation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Corder v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. H J Tucker & Associates, Inc. v. Allied Chucker & Engineering Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Wysong Corp. v. M.I. IndustriesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
  3. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Grumman Olson Industries, Inc. v. McConnell (In Re Grumman Olson Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. Appalachian Railcar Services, Inc. v. Boatright Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
  5. Kingsley Associates, Inc., Cross-Appellee. v. Del-Met, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API