Legal Opinion

Scribner v. Collar

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1879PublishedCited by 47 opinions

Case made from Superior Court of Grand Rapids. Assumpsit. Plaintiffs recovered judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

The plaintiffs recovered judgment against defendant for certain commissions, and a review of the proceedings is asked upon a case made.

The defendant owned certain real estate he wished to sell or exchange, and he employed the plaintiffs to aid him. The arrangement was in' writing and signed by defendant in a book kept by plaintiffs for such entries. After designating the property and the price and setting down the amount to stand on mortgage and the time of credit and rate of interest, it proceeded as follows:

*377“I hereby place the above described property in the hands of Messrs. Scribner and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rice v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Raisin v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  3. Walker v. OsgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. Schwartze v. YearlyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  5. Siegel v. GouldNew York Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Alvord v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. Finnerty v. FritzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
  3. Dickey v. ConverseMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Aiple-Hemmelmann Real Estate Co. v. SpelbrinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  5. DeSteiger v. HollingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API