Legal Opinion

Friar v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1899PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Kent; Adsit, ,J.. Assumpsit by Janies Friar and Martin Friar against Henry C. Smith to recover a commission on an exchange of real estate. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiffs are real-estate .brokers. This action is brought to recover a commission claimed to be due from defendant for introducing him to another customer of plaintiffs, with whom defendant made an exchange of property. The plaintiff James Friar, on the trial at the circuit, testified that he told the defendant that he had certain farms in his hands which the owner desired to exchange for city property, and that defendant agreed with him that, if he (Friar) would bring him (defendant) a customer with whom he could make a deal, a *412commission would be paid. The witness also testified that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rice v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Scribner v. CollarMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Leathers v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Montross v. EddyMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Orton v. ScofieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hannan v. PrentisMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. James E. Carlson, Inc. v. BablerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Clopton v. MeevesIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  4. McNair v. ParrMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Miller v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API