Legal Opinion
College National Bank v. Morrison
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 21, 1929No. Docket No. 5941PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
An appeal from a judgment entered against defendants Morrison and Dam. Defendant Wetherbee was not served with summons, and Morrison defaulted. Defendant Dam answered the complaint and is the sole appellant.
On February 29, 1922, Morrison, by an instrument in writing designated a lease, agreed to sell and Wetherbee, who is therein called the lessee, agreed to buy a motor-truck for the sum of $2,600, payable $875 in cash and the balance in monthly installments of $172.50, with interest. Title to the truck was reserved by the seller, and the buyer agreed to pay the sum of $100 as…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Welch v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Gnarini v. Swiss American BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- White v. StevensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Manha v. Union Fertilizer Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Niederer v. FerreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Easton v. AshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- EAC Credit Corporation v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Vilardo v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Seth v. Lew HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.