Legal Opinion

Burnes v. Scott

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 5, 1886No. 187PublishedCited by 94 opinions

• ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE western DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. This was an action at law upon a promissory note. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woods

This' was an action at law brought by Milton Courtright against James N. Burnes, the plaintiff in error, upon the note of the latter made at Chicago, and dated October 10, 1872, whereby he promised to pay, thirty days after date, to the .order of F. H. Winston, $7333, at the Cook County National Bank, in Chicago. Courtright by indorsement and transfer became the owner and holder of the note.

The defendant pleaded four pleas. The first of • these was a' general denial of the averments of the petition.

The second plea ivas in substance as follows: That when the note was made, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Lessee of HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Bank of Hamilton v. Lessee of DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. Bagnell v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  4. Thompson v. Railroad CompaniesSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  5. Jones v. McMasters Ex Rel. YbarbaSupreme Court of the United States · 1858

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Peck v. HeurichSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Galusha v. WendtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Watkins v. SedberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Wilson v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1894

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API