Legal Opinion
McArthur v. Johnson
California Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 13154PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
Upon re-examination of this cause, we desire to adopt as a part of the opinion of this court herein practically the entire opinion written by Mr. Justice pro tem. Harden of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, hereinafter set' forth as follows, to wit:
“Plaintiff sued upon a' promissory note made by defendant and payable on demand to the order of plaintiff in the sum of $2',000.00. The note was free from uncertainty or ambiguity. The defense interposed was that said note had been made for the accommodation of plaintiff and without consideration to defendant. No issues of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. SpoffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Smith v. . DotterweichNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Cashman v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Leonard v. MinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Riverisland Cold Storage, Inc. v. Fresno-Madera Production Credit Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. PendergrassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Cadigan v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- O'Melia v. AdkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Alameda County Title Insurance v. PanellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.