Legal Opinion

Herman v. Shandor

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 1970No. Civ. 1047PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COAKLEY, J.

We first consider procedural questions involved in this appeal. On May 21, 1968, a jury returned a verdict of $47,000 in appel lant’s action for personal injuries. When the verdict was entered, the respondent, at the court’s suggestion, made an oral motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. Both motions were granted. On May 24, respondent filed a formal written notice of intention to move (1) for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and (2) for a new trial. The motions were accompanied by points and authorities, and the hearing on the motions was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Jordan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Peterson v. BurkhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Doran v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Scala v. Jerry Witt & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. La Manna v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. FavaloraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Greenfield v. Spectrum Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Walton v. MagnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API