Herman v. Shandor
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COAKLEY, J.
We first consider procedural questions involved in this appeal. On May 21, 1968, a jury returned a verdict of $47,000 in appel lant’s action for personal injuries. When the verdict was entered, the respondent, at the court’s suggestion, made an oral motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. Both motions were granted. On May 24, respondent filed a formal written notice of intention to move (1) for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and (2) for a new trial. The motions were accompanied by points and authorities, and the hearing on the motions was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Jordan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Peterson v. BurkhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Doran v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Scala v. Jerry Witt & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- La Manna v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. FavaloraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Greenfield v. Spectrum Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Walton v. MagnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.