Legal Opinion
Walton v. Magno
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 14, 1994No. B071309PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIGNON, J.
Defendant and appellant Philip L. Magno appeals from an order granting a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict brought by plaintiffs and respondents Cumie L. Walton and Neda S. Walton after a jury verdict in favor of Magno on the issue of liability. The trial court ordered a trial on the issue of damages. We conclude the appeal is tajken from a nonappealable order and there is no final judgment. Accordingly, we dismiss.
Procedural Background
Plaintiffs filed an action against defendant for malicious prosecution arising out of an action for fraud brought by defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beavers v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Horton v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Herman v. ShandorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Plaza Tulare v. Tradewell Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Meyser v. American Building Maintenance, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
3Cited by10 opinions
- Trujillo v. North County Transit Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- DELL'OCA v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Cobb v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Davcon, Inc. v. Roberts & MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Cobb v. University of So. CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.