Supension of Driving Privileges of Cole v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services Branch
Oregon Supreme Court
(Consolidated for Argument and Opinion)
1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, J.
In these cases, which we consolidated for argument and decision, the Driver and Motor Vehicle Services Branch (DMV), seeks review of Court of Appeals decisions holding that hearsay evidence presented in two driver license suspension hearings did not constitute substantial evidence sufficient to support DMVs orders suspending the driver licenses. Cole v. DMV, 172 Or App 132, 17 P3d 573 (2001); Dinsmore v. DMV, 175 Or App 509, 28 P3d 1268 (2001). Substantial evidence supports a finding made in an administrative hearing when the record, viewed as a whole, permits a reasonable person to make that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Glenn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
- Stewart v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Day v. Elections Division of the Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Petteys v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- SAIF Corp. v. KolliasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.