Legal Opinion

Day v. Elections Division of the Secretary of State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 19, 2011No. 2005520; A141017PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Elections Division of the Secretary of State

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Petitioners Day and Hunnicutt were the chief petitioners responsible for the circulation and submission of Initiative Petition 57 (2006). They seek review of a final order of the Secretary of State assessing a civil penalty of $250 against each of them for violating OAR 165-014-0260(5) (Oct 15, 2003), 1 which requires the chief petitioners of an initiative to insure that the persons to whom they delegate the task of obtaining signatures on the petition do not violate Article IV, section lb, of the Oregon Constitution. That constitutional provision makes it “unlawful to pay or receive money or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Reguero v. Teacher Standards & Practices CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Supension of Driving Privileges of Cole v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services BranchOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Suspension of the Driving Privileges of Hause v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Pierce v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weldon v. Board of Licensed Professional Counselors & TherapistsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Talbott v. Teacher Standards & Practices CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Osuna-Bonilla v. Teacher Standards & Practices CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Wolfe v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API