Legal Opinion

Templar Mining Co. v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 4, 1937No. Civ. 5849PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Action in forcible entry and detainer brought by plaintiff and appellant against defendants and respondents to recover possession of certain mining lands situate in Tuba County. The defendants had judgment, and the plaintiff appeals.

The record shows that on or about the 7th day of April, 1934, the defendants in this action leased certain mining property to parties named therein, who thereupon assigned said lease to the plaintiff in this action. The plaintiff appears to have mined and operated said premises under the lease and option throughout the period involved in this action, the last work…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Utt v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Jameson v. Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Booth v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Champion Gold Mining Co. v. Champion MinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Calidino Hotel Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Swigert v. StaffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Weideman v. StaheliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Wiltsee v. UtleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API