Weideman v. Staheli
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for defendant and from an order denying new trial in an action for injunction and damages.
Plaintiffs own approximately 470 acres of land situate in a mountain canyon in the county of Riverside, and defendant owns 80 acres adjoining on the east. Defendant acquired his property in 1927, and until July of 1946, used a roadway over a portion of the property now owned by plaintiffs to reach his ranch which was farther up the canyon. In June of 1946, plaintiffs acquired their property and the following month defendant employed the owner of a bulldozer to make…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Chichester v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Utt v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Bartholomew v. StaheliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Leverone v. WeakleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. SayigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Group Property Inc. v. BruceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Sufficool v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Gaut v. FarmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Harrison v. BourisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.