Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Erickson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 13, 2001No. SCBD 4535PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoudreau, J.

[ 1 The Oklahoma Bar Association brought Rule 6 disciplinary proceedings against Respondent attorney, William E. Erickson, alleging one count of professional misconduct for implying he had the ability to improperly influence a Creek County assistant district attorney in 1998. While the bar association asserted Respondent's conduct violated Rules 8.3(a) and 8.4(a), (c), (d) and (e) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, 5 0.S8.1991 Ch. 1, App. 3A (RPC), and Rule 1.3 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S. 1991 Ch. 1, App. 1-A (RGDP), the bar focused its prosecution of Respondent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MayesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. WeeksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LAYTONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MayesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API