Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Mayes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 1999No. SCBD 4335PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.

¶ 1 Complainant, the Oklahoma Bar Association (complainant or OBA) initiated disciplinary proceedings against respondent, Robert I. Mayes, Jr., pursuant to the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), Rule 6 — Formal Proceedings Before Supreme Court and Professional Responsibility Tribunal, 5 O.S.1991, Ch. 1, App. 1-A, as amended. The parties submitted stipulations of fact, conclusions of law and an agreed recommendation of discipline to a trial panel of the Professional Responsibility Tribunal wherein respondent acknowledged certain violations of the RGDP and the Oklahoma Rules of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BraswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. McMillianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. CummingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. CombsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. SouthernSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FunkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API