Legal Opinion

Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 23, 1953No. 57260; protest 153518-K (Ogdensburg)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This case is before us on a motion to dismiss, made by the Government, on the ground that the protest was not filed within the 60-day statutory period (section 514, Tariff Act of 1930).

The pertinent portions of section 514, supra, are as follows:

SEC. 514. PROTEST AGAINST COLLECTOR’S DECISIONS.

* * * all decisions of the collector * * * as to the rate and amount of duties chargeable, and as to all exactions of whatever character * * * and his liquidation or reliquidation of any entry * * * shall, upon the expiration of sixty days after .the date of such liquidation * * * be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Psaki Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. Thalson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lustre Fibers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  3. Fairfield Gloves v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  4. Bultz v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API