Legal Opinion

Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 6, 1952No. C. D. 1388PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ekwall, Judge:

This case is before us on a motion to dismiss, filed by the Government, on the ground that the protest was not filed within the 60-day statutory period. (Section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.) Liquidation was had on October 5, 1948. The 60-day period expired on Saturday, December 4, 1948. At that time customhouses were not open for the transaction of general customs business on Saturdays. (Section 1.8, Customs Regulations of 1943, as amended.) The record shows that on the Saturday in question the liquidating division of the customhouse, where protests are filed, was closed. In the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Union National Bank v. LambSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Street v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Shefer v. MagoneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891
  4. Psaki Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. Hermann v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lustre Fibers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. Group Italglass U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
  4. F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  5. Fairfield Gloves v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API