Lustre Fibers, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Ford, Judge:
The merchandise covered by this suit was classified by the collector of customs at Charleston, S. C., under the provisions of paragraph 1302 *319of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802.
Said paragraph 1302, as modified, so far as here pertinent, reads as follows:
Waste of rayon or other synthetic textile, except waste -wholly or in chief value of cellulose acetate, 5 % ad val.
Filaments of rayon or other synthetic textile, not exceeding thirty inches in length, other than waste, whether known as cut fiber,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Greely's Administrator v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Psaki Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Thalson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Alintex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- Fairfield Gloves v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976