Legal Opinion
Fairfield Gloves v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided October 15, 1976No. C.R.D. 76-10; Court Nos. 76-1-00301PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RiChakdsoN, Judge:
On January 30, 1976 the clerk of the Customs Court received by certified mail from plaintiffs’ counsel summonses and filing fees in five cases which were required to be filed January 28, 1976. The certified mail envelope containing the summonses and filing fees did not contain a postmark date. Plaintiffs’ counsel made an affidavit that they were mailed by certified mail January 28, 1976, and attached to his motion to have the date of filing corrected to January 28, 1976 (the 180th day after the denial of the plaintiffs’ protests), as an exhibit, his receipt for certified…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Union National Bank v. LambSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- District of Columbia v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- MacNeil v. Hearst CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1958
- Wilson v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- Texas Mex Brick & Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- M.A. Mortenson Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993