Bultz v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge:
The merchandise in these cases, consolidated at the trial, consists of chairs and other furniture imported from Hong Kong on various dates between 1959 and 1963, inclusive, and entered *378at various ports.1 The merchandise was assessed with duty at various rates under paragraph 409 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 54108, or as modified by T.D. 55615 and T.D. 55649, as furniture wholly or in chief value of rattan or rattan and the other materials enumerated. The chairs are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Akeroyd v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Chas. Kurz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- United States v. Hurlburt & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- Slazengers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.