Legal Opinion
Transcentury Properties v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 19, 1974No. Docket Nos. 33995, 34339, 33910PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIAN, J.
The People of the State of California appeal, and in a related proceeding seek a writ of prohibition, to test several actions of the superior court in regard to a proposed seaside development in Sonoma County. The litigation commenced with Transcentury Properties, Inc. (owner and developer of the “Bodega Harbour” development on Bodega Bay), the Bodega Harbour Homeowners’ Association, and three owners of lots in the development sought the following relief:(1) A declaration that the project is exempt from the California Coastal Zone Act of 1972 (hereinafter “the Act”) (Pub.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission v. Town of EmeryvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Frink v. ProdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Fairfield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Woods v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Interstate Brands v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Aries Development Co. v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.