Legal Opinion
In Re Leavitt
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 19, 1959No. Crim. 6791PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHEA, J., pro tem. *
Petition for writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner is the defendant in a divorce action. He was ordered to pay alimony. He was in default and an execution was issued and was returned unsatisfied. Plaintiff-wife sought to enforce the order by supplementary proceedings. An order was issued requiring the defendant to appear for a judgment-debtor’s examination on July 14, 1959.
An order to show causé in re contempt, previously issued, had been dismissed. A second one was issued and served upon the defendant on July 14, 1959, at the time that he appeared in court. The order to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blau v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fross v. WottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Ex parte GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Ex Parte JoutsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Warford v. MedeirosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Zonver v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Nutter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Cantor v. SaitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. BarriosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.