Legal Opinion

Cantor v. Saitz

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1978No. 39307PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLIAN, Judge.

Our preliminary writ of prohibition was issued to respondent circuit judge to show cause why he should not be prohibited from compelling relator Sol F. Cantor to answer questions which may tend to incriminate him.

On May 12,1977, an examination of judgment debtor and relator in this proceeding Sol F. Cantor was held pursuant to Rule 76.64, as a result of a judgment registered by plaintiff XYOmed, Inc. During the examination by plaintiff’s counsel, Cantor invoked his privilege against self-incrimination under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. North v. KirtleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. State Ex Rel. Lee v. CavanaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. State Ex Rel. Howard v. AllisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Ex parte GaussSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. State Ex Rel. Caloia v. WeinsteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Munn v. McKelveySupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. Eastham v. ArndtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. State v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. Harry Shapiro Realty & Investment Co. v. CloydSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  5. State ex rel. Flynn v. SchroederMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API