Legal Opinion

People v. Barrios

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1985No. F003271PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOOLPERT, J.

In April of 1983 defendant was charged with violation of Penal Code section 187 (murder). It was also alleged that defendant had used a firearm, within the meaning of section 12022.5, during the commission of the crime. Defendant pled not guilty.

A nine-day jury trial followed in August. After the jury was selected, defendant made a motion to bar use of his postarrest statements to police. He objected to their use in the prosecution’s case-in-chief or for impeachment. The motion was denied. The jury found defendant guilty of first degree murder. The firearm use allegation…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. AzureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. People v. HerbstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. People v. MarzettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. People v. AzureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. People v. AzureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API